[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200618221352.GB279339@lunn.ch>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 00:13:52 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
vladimir.oltean@....com, claudiu.manoil@....com,
alexandru.marginean@....com, michael@...le.cc,
linux@...linux.org.uk, f.fainelli@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/5] net: phy: add Lynx PCS MDIO module
> MAINTAINERS | 7 +
> drivers/net/phy/Kconfig | 6 +
> drivers/net/phy/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/net/phy/mdio-lynx-pcs.c | 358 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/mdio-lynx-pcs.h | 43 ++++
> 5 files changed, 415 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/net/phy/mdio-lynx-pcs.c
> create mode 100644 include/linux/mdio-lynx-pcs.h
Hi Ioana
We should think about naming convention here.
All MDIO bus driver, MDIO multiplexors etc use mdio- as a prefix.
This is not a bus driver, so i don't think it should use the mdio-
prefix. How about pcs-lynx.c?
In terms of Kconfig, MDIO_ prefix is used for MDIO bus drivers etc. I
don't think it is appropriate here. How about PCS_LYNX? I don't think
any other subsystem is using PCS_ as a prefix.
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/Kconfig
> @@ -235,6 +235,12 @@ config MDIO_XPCS
> This module provides helper functions for Synopsys DesignWare XPCS
> controllers.
>
> +config MDIO_LYNX_PCS
> + bool
> + help
> + This module provides helper functions for Lynx PCS enablement
> + representing the PCS as an MDIO device.
> +
> endif
> endif
Maybe add this at the end, and add a
comment "PCS device drivers"
before it? I'm assuming with time we will have more of these drivers.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists