netdev - [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.7 367/388] bpf/sockmap: Fix kernel panic at __tcp_bpf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200618010805.600873-367-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 17 Jun 2020 21:07:44 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     dihu <anny.hu@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.7 367/388] bpf/sockmap: Fix kernel panic at __tcp_bpf_recvmsg

From: dihu <anny.hu@...ux.alibaba.com>

[ Upstream commit 487082fb7bd2a32b66927d2b22e3a81b072b44f0 ]

When user application calls read() with MSG_PEEK flag to read data
of bpf sockmap socket, kernel panic happens at
__tcp_bpf_recvmsg+0x12c/0x350. sk_msg is not removed from ingress_msg
queue after read out under MSG_PEEK flag is set. Because it's not
judged whether sk_msg is the last msg of ingress_msg queue, the next
sk_msg may be the head of ingress_msg queue, whose memory address of
sg page is invalid. So it's necessary to add check codes to prevent
this problem.

[20759.125457] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address:
0000000000000008
[20759.132118] CPU: 53 PID: 51378 Comm: envoy Tainted: G            E
5.4.32 #1
[20759.140890] Hardware name: Inspur SA5212M4/YZMB-00370-109, BIOS
4.1.12 06/18/2017
[20759.149734] RIP: 0010:copy_page_to_iter+0xad/0x300
[20759.270877] __tcp_bpf_recvmsg+0x12c/0x350
[20759.276099] tcp_bpf_recvmsg+0x113/0x370
[20759.281137] inet_recvmsg+0x55/0xc0
[20759.285734] __sys_recvfrom+0xc8/0x130
[20759.290566] ? __audit_syscall_entry+0x103/0x130
[20759.296227] ? syscall_trace_enter+0x1d2/0x2d0
[20759.301700] ? __audit_syscall_exit+0x1e4/0x290
[20759.307235] __x64_sys_recvfrom+0x24/0x30
[20759.312226] do_syscall_64+0x55/0x1b0
[20759.316852] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

Signed-off-by: dihu <anny.hu@...ux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Acked-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200605084625.9783-1-anny.hu@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
index 9c5540887fbe..7aa68f4aae6c 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
@@ -64,6 +64,9 @@ int __tcp_bpf_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock,
 		} while (i != msg_rx->sg.end);
 
 		if (unlikely(peek)) {
+			if (msg_rx == list_last_entry(&psock->ingress_msg,
+						      struct sk_msg, list))
+				break;
 			msg_rx = list_next_entry(msg_rx, list);
 			continue;
 		}
-- 
2.25.1