netdev - Re: [net-next PATCH 1/5] net: dsa: tag_rtl4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALW65jYDiLc177cdoUgUUwC_JnW3vMo8ECBth2CooiznmY_UVg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 18 Jun 2020 11:17:54 +0800
From:   DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mauri Sandberg <sandberg@...lfence.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 1/5] net: dsa: tag_rtl4_a: Implement Realtek 4
 byte A tag

Hi

On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 4:06 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 1:23 PM Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > In the code you pointed to, there is a potentially relevant comment:
> >
> > 1532//CPU tag: Realtek Ethertype==0x8899(2 bytes)+protocol==0x9(4
> > MSB)+priority(2 bits)+reserved(4 bits)+portmask(6 LSB)
> >
> > https://svn.dd-wrt.com/browser/src/linux/universal/linux-3.2/drivers/net/ethernet/raeth/rb/rtl_multicast_snooping.c#L1527
> > https://svn.dd-wrt.com/browser/src/linux/universal/linux-3.2/drivers/net/ethernet/raeth/rb/rtl_multicast_snooping.c#L5224
> >
> > This strongly indicates to me that the insertion tag is the same as
> > the extraction tag.
>
> This code is a problem because it is Realtek-development style.
> This style seems to be that the hardware people write the drivers
> using copy/paste from the previous ASIC and ship is as soon as
> possible. Keep this in mind.
>
> The above tag is using protocol 9 and is actually even documented
> in a PDF I have for RTL8306. The problem is that the RTL8366RB
> (I suspect also RTL8366S) uses protocol "a" (as in hex 10).
> Which is of course necessarily different.
>
> I have *really* tried to figure out how the bits in protocol a works
> when transmissing from the CPU port to any switch port.
>
> When nothing else worked, I just tried all bit combinations with
> 0xannp where a is protocol and p is port. I looped through all
> values several times trying to get a response from ping.

Have you looped through the whole 32-bit field?

>
> So this is really how far I can get right now, even with brute
> force.
>
> > It is completely opaque to me why in patch "[net-next PATCH 2/5] net:
> > dsa: rtl8366rb: Support the CPU DSA tag" you are _disabling_ the
> > injection of these tags via RTL8368RB_CPU_INSTAG. I think it's natural
> > that the switch drops these packets when CPU tag insertion is
> > disabled.
>
> This is another Realtek-ism where they managed to invert the
> meaning of a bit.
>
> Bit 15 in register 0x0061 (RTL8368RB_CPU_CTRL_REG) can
> be set to 1 and then the special (custom) CPU tag 0x8899
> protocol a will be DISABLED. This value Realtek calls
> "RTL8368RB_CPU_INSTAG" which makes you think that
> the tag will be inserted, it is named "instag" right? But that
> is not how it works.
>
> That bit needs to be set to 0 to insert the tag and 1 to disable
> insertion of the tag.
>
> For this reason the patch also renames this bit to
> RTL8368RB_CPU_NO_TAG which is more to the point.
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij