[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200619132330.GH2465907@krava>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 15:23:30 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
David Miller <davem@...hat.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Wenbo Zhang <ethercflow@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
Brendan Gregg <bgregg@...flix.com>,
Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] bpf: Do not pass enum bpf_access_type to
btf_struct_access
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 08:58:06PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 3:06 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > There's no need for it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
> > ---
>
> It matches bpf_verifier_ops->btf_struct_access, though, which, I
> think, actually allows write access for some special cases. So I think
> we should keep it.
ok, will keep it
jirka
>
> > include/linux/bpf.h | 1 -
> > kernel/bpf/btf.c | 3 +--
> > kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 2 +-
> > net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ca.c | 2 +-
> > 4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
>
> [...]
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists