netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC v8 02/11] vhost: use batched get_vq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 19 Jun 2020 19:56:04 +0200
From:   Eugenio Perez Martin <eperezma@...hat.com>
To:     Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc:     "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v8 02/11] vhost: use batched get_vq_desc version

On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 5:19 AM Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 2020/6/11 下午7:34, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >   static void vhost_vq_free_iovecs(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
> >   {
> >       kfree(vq->descs);
> > @@ -394,6 +400,9 @@ static long vhost_dev_alloc_iovecs(struct vhost_dev *dev)
> >       for (i = 0; i < dev->nvqs; ++i) {
> >               vq = dev->vqs[i];
> >               vq->max_descs = dev->iov_limit;
> > +             if (vhost_vq_num_batch_descs(vq) < 0) {
> > +                     return -EINVAL;
> > +             }
>
>
> This check breaks vdpa which set iov_limit to zero. Consider iov_limit
> is meaningless to vDPA, I wonder we can skip the test when device
> doesn't use worker.

I tested as

if (dev->use_worker && vhost_vq_num_batch_descs(vq) < 0)

In v9. Please let me know if that is ok for you.

Thanks!

>
> Thanks
>