netdev - Re: [PATCH 06/11] bpf: Do not pass enum bpf_access_type to btf_struct

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 18 Jun 2020 20:58:06 -0700
From:   Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        David Miller <davem@...hat.com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Wenbo Zhang <ethercflow@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
        Brendan Gregg <bgregg@...flix.com>,
        Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] bpf: Do not pass enum bpf_access_type to btf_struct_access

On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 3:06 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> There's no need for it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
> ---

It matches bpf_verifier_ops->btf_struct_access, though, which, I
think, actually allows write access for some special cases. So I think
we should keep it.

>  include/linux/bpf.h   | 1 -
>  kernel/bpf/btf.c      | 3 +--
>  kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 2 +-
>  net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ca.c | 2 +-
>  4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>

[...]