[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200623070934.GB575172@splinter>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 10:09:34 +0300
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
To: Po Liu <po.liu@....com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, jiri@...nulli.us, vinicius.gomes@...el.com,
vlad@...lov.dev, claudiu.manoil@....com, vladimir.oltean@....com,
alexandru.marginean@....com, michael.chan@...adcom.com,
vishal@...lsio.com, saeedm@...lanox.com, leon@...nel.org,
jiri@...lanox.com, idosch@...lanox.com,
alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
kuba@...nel.org, jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
simon.horman@...ronome.com, pablo@...filter.org,
moshe@...lanox.com, m-karicheri2@...com,
andre.guedes@...ux.intel.com, stephen@...workplumber.org
Subject: Re: [v1,net-next 3/4] net: qos: police action add index for tc
flower offloading
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 02:34:11PM +0800, Po Liu wrote:
> From: Po Liu <Po.Liu@....com>
>
> Hardware may own many entries for police flow. So that make one(or
> multi) flow to be policed by one hardware entry. This patch add the
> police action index provide to the driver side make it mapping the
> driver hardware entry index.
Maybe first mention that it is possible for multiple filters in software
to share the same policer. Something like:
"
It is possible for several tc filters to share the same police action by
specifying the action's index when installing the filters.
Propagate this index to device drivers through the flow offload
intermediate representation, so that drivers could share a single
hardware policer between multiple filters.
"
>
> Signed-off-by: Po Liu <Po.Liu@....com>
> ---
> include/net/flow_offload.h | 1 +
> net/sched/cls_api.c | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/flow_offload.h b/include/net/flow_offload.h
> index c2ef19c6b27d..eed98075b1ae 100644
> --- a/include/net/flow_offload.h
> +++ b/include/net/flow_offload.h
> @@ -232,6 +232,7 @@ struct flow_action_entry {
> bool truncate;
> } sample;
> struct { /* FLOW_ACTION_POLICE */
> + u32 index;
> s64 burst;
> u64 rate_bytes_ps;
> u32 mtu;
> diff --git a/net/sched/cls_api.c b/net/sched/cls_api.c
> index 6aba7d5ba1ec..fdc4c89ca1fa 100644
> --- a/net/sched/cls_api.c
> +++ b/net/sched/cls_api.c
> @@ -3659,6 +3659,7 @@ int tc_setup_flow_action(struct flow_action *flow_action,
> entry->police.rate_bytes_ps =
> tcf_police_rate_bytes_ps(act);
> entry->police.mtu = tcf_police_tcfp_mtu(act);
> + entry->police.index = act->tcfa_index;
> } else if (is_tcf_ct(act)) {
> entry->id = FLOW_ACTION_CT;
> entry->ct.action = tcf_ct_action(act);
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists