netdev - Re: [PATCH net v2 0/2] bridge: mrp: Update MRP_PORT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200624113156.hsutqewk4xntmkld@soft-dev3.localdomain>
Date:   Wed, 24 Jun 2020 13:31:56 +0200
From:   Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:     <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>, <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
        <kuba@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 0/2] bridge: mrp: Update MRP_PORT_ROLE

The 06/23/2020 14:38, David Miller wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> From: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 11:05:39 +0200
> 
> > This patch series does the following:
> > - fixes the enum br_mrp_port_role_type. It removes the port role none(0x2)
> >   because this is in conflict with the standard. The standard defines the
> >   interconnect port role as value 0x2.
> > - adds checks regarding current defined port roles: primary(0x0) and
> >   secondary(0x1).
> >
> > v2:
> >  - add the validation code when setting the port role.
> 
> Series applied, thank you.

Thanks. Will these patches be applied also on net-next?
Because if I start now to add support for the interconnect port, these
patches are needed on net-next. Or do I need to add these patches to the
patch series for the interconnect port?
What is the correct way of doing this?

-- 
/Horatiu