[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200624210606.GA1362687@zx2c4.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 15:06:06 -0600
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To: Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@...nk.ru>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Petr Machata <petrm@...lanox.com>,
Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>,
Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: core: use listified Rx for GRO_NORMAL
in napi_gro_receive()
Hi Alexander,
This patch introduced a behavior change around GRO_DROP:
napi_skb_finish used to sometimes return GRO_DROP:
> -static gro_result_t napi_skb_finish(gro_result_t ret, struct sk_buff *skb)
> +static gro_result_t napi_skb_finish(struct napi_struct *napi,
> + struct sk_buff *skb,
> + gro_result_t ret)
> {
> switch (ret) {
> case GRO_NORMAL:
> - if (netif_receive_skb_internal(skb))
> - ret = GRO_DROP;
> + gro_normal_one(napi, skb);
>
But under your change, gro_normal_one and the various calls that makes
never propagates its return value, and so GRO_DROP is never returned to
the caller, even if something drops it.
Was this intentional? Or should I start looking into how to restore it?
Thanks,
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists