netdev - Re: [PATCH RESEND] net/cisco: Fix a sleep-in-atomic-context bug in enic_init_affinity

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7533075e-0e8e-2fde-c8fa-72e2ea222176@loongson.cn>
Date:   Wed, 24 Jun 2020 09:56:47 +0800
From:   Kaige Li <likaige@...ngson.cn>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     benve@...co.com, _govind@....com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lixuefeng@...ngson.cn,
        yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] net/cisco: Fix a sleep-in-atomic-context bug in
 enic_init_affinity_hint()


On 06/24/2020 06:26 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 14:33:11 -0700 (PDT)
>
>> Calling a NIC driver open function from a context holding a spinlock
>> is very much the real problem, so many operations have to sleep and
>> in face that ->ndo_open() method is defined as being allowed to sleep
>> and that's why the core networking never invokes it with spinlocks
>                                                        ^^^^
>
> I mean "without" of course. :-)
>
>> held.

Did you mean that open function should be out of spinlock? If so, I will
send V2 patch.

Thank you.