[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMj1kXG5MqCPJ3zG4P0NNzDC9qzwwCSOw09Bgi+SYm_0YFhmFg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 21:32:57 +0200
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...tlin.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: phy: mscc: avoid skcipher API for single block
AES encryption
On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 at 21:16, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>
> From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 09:18:16 +0200
>
> > The skcipher API dynamically instantiates the transformation object
> > on request that implements the requested algorithm optimally on the
> > given platform. This notion of optimality only matters for cases like
> > bulk network or disk encryption, where performance can be a bottleneck,
> > or in cases where the algorithm itself is not known at compile time.
> >
> > In the mscc case, we are dealing with AES encryption of a single
> > block, and so neither concern applies, and we are better off using
> > the AES library interface, which is lightweight and safe for this
> > kind of use.
> >
> > Note that the scatterlist API does not permit references to buffers
> > that are located on the stack, so the existing code is incorrect in
> > any case, but avoiding the skcipher and scatterlist APIs entirely is
> > the most straight-forward approach to fixing this.
> >
> > Fixes: 28c5107aa904e ("net: phy: mscc: macsec support")
> > Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
>
> Applied and queued up for -stable, thanks.
>
> Please never CC: stable for networking changes, I handle the submissions
> by hand.
>
Noted, thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists