[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200624.220439.52653230093330004.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 22:04:39 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: po.liu@....com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
idosch@...sch.org, jiri@...nulli.us, vinicius.gomes@...el.com,
vlad@...lov.dev, claudiu.manoil@....com, vladimir.oltean@....com,
alexandru.marginean@....com, michael.chan@...adcom.com,
vishal@...lsio.com, saeedm@...lanox.com, leon@...nel.org,
jiri@...lanox.com, idosch@...lanox.com,
alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
kuba@...nel.org, jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
simon.horman@...ronome.com, pablo@...filter.org,
moshe@...lanox.com, m-karicheri2@...com,
andre.guedes@...ux.intel.com, stephen@...workplumber.org
Subject: Re: [v2,net-next 1/4] net: qos: add tc police offloading action
with max frame size limit
From: Po Liu <po.liu@....com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 17:36:28 +0800
> From: Po Liu <Po.Liu@....com>
>
> Current police offloading support the 'burst'' and 'rate_bytes_ps'. Some
> hardware own the capability to limit the frame size. If the frame size
> larger than the setting, the frame would be dropped. For the police
> action itself already accept the 'mtu' parameter in tc command. But not
> extend to tc flower offloading. So extend 'mtu' to tc flower offloading.
>
> Signed-off-by: Po Liu <Po.Liu@....com>
Applied.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists