netdev - Re: [PATCH linux-can-next/flexcan] can: flexcan: fix TDC feature

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <39b5d77bda519c4d836f44a554890bae@walle.cc>
Date:   Thu, 25 Jun 2020 14:37:43 +0200
From:   Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
To:     Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>, mkl@...gutronix.de
Cc:     linux-can@...r.kernel.org, dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-can-next/flexcan] can: flexcan: fix TDC feature

Am 2020-06-02 12:15, schrieb Michael Walle:
> Hi Marc,
> 
> Am 2020-04-16 11:41, schrieb Joakim Zhang:
>> Hi Marc,
>> 
>> How about FlexCAN FD patch set, it is pending for a long time. Many
>> work would base on it, we are happy to see it in upstream mainline
>> ASAP.
>> 
>> Michael Walle also gives out the test-by tag:
>> 	Tested-by: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
> 
> There seems to be no activity for months here. Any reason for that? Is
> there anything we can do to speed things up?

ping.. There are no replies or anything. Sorry but this is really
annoying and frustrating.

Marc, is there anything wrong with the flexcan patches?

-michael