netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 5/7] net: dsa: felix: delete .phylink_mac_an

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+h21hoDVQfeVZJaSJ1BymVcATgJq5zoHo2_K7JnG2V22RKe5A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 26 Jun 2020 14:19:42 +0300
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
        Alexandru Marginean <alexandru.marginean@....com>,
        Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/7] net: dsa: felix: delete .phylink_mac_an_restart
 code

On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 14:08, Russell King - ARM Linux admin
<linux@...linux.org.uk> wrote:
>

[snip]

>
> So, I ask again, what practical use and benefit does restarting the
> configuration exchange on a SGMII or USXGMII link have?  Give me a real
> life use case where there's a problem with a link that this can solve.
>

You are pushing the discussion in an area that to me is pretty
insignificant, and where I did _not_ want to go. I said:

> This is
> probably OK, I can't come up with a situation where it might be useful for the
> MAC PCS to clear its cache of link state and ask for a new tx_config_reg. So
> remove this code.

I was going to remove this code in the first place, it's just that you
didn't like the justification in the initial commit message. Fine. So
I asked you if this new commit message is OK. You said:

> This is going over the top

So let's cut this short: we agree about everything now, hardware
behavior and software behavior. Could you edit my commit message in a
way that you agree with, and paste it here so that I could include it
in v2?

Thanks,
-Vladimir