netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH 9/9] dt-bindings: net: dsa: Add documentation for Hellcreek switches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <449f0a03-a91d-ae82-b31f-59dfd1457ec5@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 26 Jun 2020 10:11:40 -0700
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
        Kamil Alkhouri <kamil.alkhouri@...offenburg.de>,
        ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 9/9] dt-bindings: net: dsa: Add documentation for
 Hellcreek switches

On 6/22/20 5:05 AM, Kurt Kanzenbach wrote:
> On Fri Jun 19 2020, Kurt Kanzenbach wrote:
>> On Thu Jun 18 2020, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> On 6/17/2020 11:40 PM, Kurt Kanzenbach wrote:
>>>> Add basic documentation and example.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>
>>>> ---
>>>>  .../devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/hellcreek.txt | 72 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>>  1 file changed, 72 insertions(+)
>>>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/hellcreek.txt
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/hellcreek.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/hellcreek.txt
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 000000000000..9ea6494dc554
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/hellcreek.txt
>>>
>>> This should be a YAML binding and we should also convert the DSA binding
>>> to YAML one day.
>>
>> OK.
> 
> I converted it into a YAML binding. Should I provide the dsa.yaml as
> well? Otherwise I have to define the DSA properties such as dsa,member
> in the hellcreek.yaml file.

If you have the generic DSA binding converted as YAML that would be
highly welcome you can submit that separately from your patch series.

There are quite a few Device Tree sources in tree that can be used as a
validation vector for dsa.yaml.
-- 
Florian