[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <MW3PR11MB45228441F903267FBEC31EF98F930@MW3PR11MB4522.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 17:52:52 +0000
From: "Brady, Alan" <alan.brady@...el.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "Michael, Alice" <alice.michael@...el.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"nhorman@...hat.com" <nhorman@...hat.com>,
"sassmann@...hat.com" <sassmann@...hat.com>,
"Burra, Phani R" <phani.r.burra@...el.com>,
"Hay, Joshua A" <joshua.a.hay@...el.com>,
"Chittim, Madhu" <madhu.chittim@...el.com>,
"Linga, Pavan Kumar" <pavan.kumar.linga@...el.com>,
"Skidmore, Donald C" <donald.c.skidmore@...el.com>,
"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
"Samudrala, Sridhar" <sridhar.samudrala@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [net-next v3 12/15] iecm: Add singleq TX/RX
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
> Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2020 8:12 PM
> To: Kirsher, Jeffrey T <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>; davem@...emloft.net
> Cc: Michael, Alice <alice.michael@...el.com>; netdev@...r.kernel.org;
> nhorman@...hat.com; sassmann@...hat.com; Brady, Alan
> <alan.brady@...el.com>; Burra, Phani R <phani.r.burra@...el.com>; Hay,
> Joshua A <joshua.a.hay@...el.com>; Chittim, Madhu
> <madhu.chittim@...el.com>; Linga, Pavan Kumar
> <pavan.kumar.linga@...el.com>; Skidmore, Donald C
> <donald.c.skidmore@...el.com>; Brandeburg, Jesse
> <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>; Samudrala, Sridhar
> <sridhar.samudrala@...el.com>
> Subject: Re: [net-next v3 12/15] iecm: Add singleq TX/RX
>
> On Thu, 2020-06-25 at 19:07 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> > From: Alice Michael <alice.michael@...el.com>
> >
> > Implement legacy single queue model for TX/RX flows.
> []
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iecm/iecm_singleq_txrx.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iecm/iecm_singleq_txrx.c
> []
> > @@ -145,7 +508,63 @@ static void iecm_rx_singleq_csum(struct iecm_queue
> *rxq, struct sk_buff *skb,
> > struct iecm_singleq_base_rx_desc *rx_desc,
> > u8 ptype)
> > {
> []
> > + if (ipv4 && (rx_error & (BIT(IECM_RX_BASE_DESC_ERROR_IPE_S) |
> > + BIT(IECM_RX_BASE_DESC_ERROR_EIPE_S))))
> > + goto checksum_fail;
> > + else if (ipv6 && (rx_status &
> > + (BIT(IECM_RX_BASE_DESC_STATUS_IPV6EXADD_S))))
> > + goto checksum_fail;
> > +
> > + /* check for L4 errors and handle packets that were not able to be
> > + * checksummed due to arrival speed
> > + */
> > + if (rx_error & BIT(IECM_RX_BASE_DESC_ERROR_L3L4E_S))
> > + goto checksum_fail;
> []
> > +checksum_fail:
> > + dev_dbg(rxq->dev, "RX Checksum not available\n");
>
> If there's an actual checksum arrival speed issue, then likely this dbg output
> should be ratelimited too.
>
Yeah this is an issue. I think we want to add a counter here instead of printing anything out anyway. Will fix.
Alan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists