[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200626205726.nx54ztdtmo3fxbxm@liuwe-devbox-debian-v2>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 20:57:26 +0000
From: Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>
To: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>, Andres Beltran <lkmlabelt@...il.com>,
kys@...rosoft.com, haiyangz@...rosoft.com, sthemmin@...rosoft.com,
linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mikelley@...rosoft.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Drivers: hv: vmbus: vmbus_requestor data structure
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 04:48:17PM +0200, Andrea Parri wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 01:42:27PM +0000, Wei Liu wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 11:37:20AM -0400, Andres Beltran wrote:
> > > From: Andres Beltran (Microsoft) <lkmlabelt@...il.com>
> > >
> > > Currently, VMbus drivers use pointers into guest memory as request IDs
> > > for interactions with Hyper-V. To be more robust in the face of errors
> > > or malicious behavior from a compromised Hyper-V, avoid exposing
> > > guest memory addresses to Hyper-V. Also avoid Hyper-V giving back a
> > > bad request ID that is then treated as the address of a guest data
> > > structure with no validation. Instead, encapsulate these memory
> > > addresses and provide small integers as request IDs.
> > >
> > > The first patch creates the definitions for the data structure, provides
> > > helper methods to generate new IDs and retrieve data, and
> > > allocates/frees the memory needed for vmbus_requestor.
> > >
> > > The second and third patches make use of vmbus_requestor to send request
> > > IDs to Hyper-V in storvsc and netvsc respectively.
> > >
> >
> > Per my understanding, this new data structure is per-channel, so it
> > won't introduce contention on the lock in multi-queue scenario. Have you
> > done any testing to confirm there is no severe performance regression?
>
> I did run some performance tests using our dev pipeline (storage and
> network workloads). I did not find regressions w.r.t. baseline.
Thanks, that's good to hear.
Wei.
>
> Andrea
Powered by blists - more mailing lists