lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 27 Jun 2020 14:33:30 +0200
From:   Oliver Herms <oliver.peter.herms@...il.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: IPv4: Why are sysctl settings of abandoned route cache / GC still
 around?

Hi list,

is there a reason sysctl settings like net/ipv4/route/
- max_size
- gc_thresh
- gc_min_interval
- gc_min_interval_ms
- gc_elasticity
are still around in current kernels? 

I find this just confusing and misleading.
If there are no concerns I'd like to remove those. I have a patch ready.

Kind Regards
Oliver

Powered by blists - more mailing lists