[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <073f94da-c36c-e737-3b41-7671a942eb7b@huawei.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 08:58:26 +0800
From: "luobin (L)" <luobin9@...wei.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<luoxianjun@...wei.com>, <yin.yinshi@...wei.com>,
<cloud.wangxiaoyun@...wei.com>, <chiqijun@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/5] hinic: add some ethtool ops support
On 2020/6/28 8:52, David Miller wrote:
> From: Luo bin <luobin9@...wei.com>
> Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 14:52:37 +0800
>
>> patch #1: support to set and get pause params with
>> "ethtool -A/a" cmd
>> patch #2: support to set and get irq coalesce params with
>> "ethtool -C/c" cmd
>> patch #3: support to do self test with "ethtool -t" cmd
>> patch #4: support to identify physical device with "ethtool -p" cmd
>> patch #5: support to get eeprom information with "ethtool -m" cmd
>
> In general, I want you to decrease the amount of log messages.
>
> You should only use them when the device or the kernel does something
> unexpected which should be notifier to the user.
>
> Kernel log messages are not for informating the user of limitations
> of what they can perform with "ethtool".
>
> For example, when setting pause paramenters, you complain in the logs
> if the autonet setting is different.
>
> This is completely inappropriate.
>
> Then in patch #2 you have these crazy macros that print out state
> changes with netdev_info(). That is also inappropriate. The user
> gets a success status, and they can query the settings later if
> they like as well.
>
> Please stop abusing kernel log messaging, it isn't a framework for
> giving more detailed ethtool command result statuses.
>
> Thank you.
> .
>
Okay, I'll remove these normal kernel logs. Thank you for your review.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists