[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6541539.18pcnM708K@laptop.coltonlewis.name>
Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 21:36:35 +0000
From: Colton Lewis <colton.w.lewis@...tonmail.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] net: phylink: correct trivial kernel-doc inconsistencies
> We seem to be having a communication breakdown. In review to your
> version 2 patch set, I said:
>
> However, please drop all your changes for everything but the
> "struct phylink_config" documentation change; I'm intending to change
> all these method signatures, which means your changes will conflict.
>
> But the changes still exist in version 3. What gives?
You said *drop all your changes* for *everything but* the struct phylink_config change. I interpreted this to mean you wanted *only* struct phylink_config. In context of your previous comments, I might have guessed you meant the opposite.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists