[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+FuTSdd7BN-DHud5ZpyYce1r9dXvaGq-T2eXABhF1YL5u4h5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 16:55:42 -0400
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To: Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>
Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] icmp: support rfc 4884
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 4:34 PM Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 12:23 PM Willem de Bruijn
> <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
> >
> > ICMP messages may include an extension structure after the original
> > datagram. RFC 4884 standardized this behavior.
> >
> > It introduces an explicit original datagram length field in the ICMP
> > header to delineate the original datagram from the extension struct.
> >
> > Return this field when reading an ICMP error from the error queue.
> >
> > ICMPv6 by default already returns the entire 32-bit part of the header
> > that includes this field by default. For consistency, do the exact
> > same for ICMP. So far it only returns mtu on ICMP_FRAG_NEEDED and gw
> > on ICMP_PARAMETERPROB.
> >
> > For backwards compatibility, make this optional, set by setsockopt
> > SOL_IP/IP_RECVERR_RFC4884. For API documentation and feature test, see
> > https://github.com/wdebruij/kerneltools/blob/master/tests/recv_icmp.c
> >
> > Alternative implementation to reading from the skb in ip_icmp_error
> > is to pass the field from icmp_unreach, again analogous to ICMPv6. But
> > this would require changes to every $proto_err() callback, which for
> > ICMP_FRAG_NEEDED pass the u32 info arg to a pmtu update function.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
> > ---
> > include/net/inet_sock.h | 1 +
> > include/uapi/linux/in.h | 1 +
> > net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/net/inet_sock.h b/include/net/inet_sock.h
> > index a7ce00af6c44..a3702d1d4875 100644
> > --- a/include/net/inet_sock.h
> > +++ b/include/net/inet_sock.h
> > @@ -225,6 +225,7 @@ struct inet_sock {
> > mc_all:1,
> > nodefrag:1;
> > __u8 bind_address_no_port:1,
> > + recverr_rfc4884:1,
> > defer_connect:1; /* Indicates that fastopen_connect is set
> > * and cookie exists so we defer connect
> > * until first data frame is written
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/in.h b/include/uapi/linux/in.h
> > index 8533bf07450f..3d0d8231dc19 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/in.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/in.h
> > @@ -123,6 +123,7 @@ struct in_addr {
> > #define IP_CHECKSUM 23
> > #define IP_BIND_ADDRESS_NO_PORT 24
> > #define IP_RECVFRAGSIZE 25
> > +#define IP_RECVERR_RFC4884 26
> >
> > /* IP_MTU_DISCOVER values */
> > #define IP_PMTUDISC_DONT 0 /* Never send DF frames */
> > diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c b/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c
> > index 84ec3703c909..525140e3947c 100644
> > --- a/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c
> > @@ -398,6 +398,9 @@ void ip_icmp_error(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int err,
> > if (!skb)
> > return;
> >
> > + if (inet_sk(sk)->recverr_rfc4884)
> > + info = ntohl(icmp_hdr(skb)->un.gateway);
> > +
> Willem,
>
> Doesn't this assume that all received ICMP errors received on the
> socket use the extended RFC4884 format once the option is set on the
> socket?
>
> I think what we might need to do this properly is to switch on the
> ICMP Type/Code to determine if the format is RFC4884. If it is then,
> we can figure out where the appropriate info for the ICMP error is.
> Good example of this is draft-ietf-6man-icmp-limits-08 currently on
> the RFC editor queue. A code for destination unreachable is added for
> "aggregate header limit exceeded". An RFC4884 format is used to
> contain an ICMP extension that includes a pointer to the offending
> byte (unlike parameter problem, destination unreachable doesn't have
> Pointer in ICMP header). So in this case it makes sense that the
> kernel returns the Pointer in extended ICMP as the info.
This implementation matches the existing behavior of ICMPv6.
You're right that the RFC 4884 length field is relevant only for a
selection of ICMP types. For other types most of the bits are
reserved. I don't see any issue with exposing those. Anything
more fine grained will have to be extended for each
additional feature such as the one you mention. I prefer to just make
this information available once and for all. It really helped that it
was already available on v6, for instance.
> Tom
>
>
> > serr = SKB_EXT_ERR(skb);
> > serr->ee.ee_errno = err;
> > serr->ee.ee_origin = SO_EE_ORIGIN_ICMP;
> > @@ -755,6 +758,7 @@ static int do_ip_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level,
> > case IP_RECVORIGDSTADDR:
> > case IP_CHECKSUM:
> > case IP_RECVFRAGSIZE:
> > + case IP_RECVERR_RFC4884:
> > if (optlen >= sizeof(int)) {
> > if (get_user(val, (int __user *) optval))
> > return -EFAULT;
> > @@ -914,6 +918,11 @@ static int do_ip_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level,
> > if (!val)
> > skb_queue_purge(&sk->sk_error_queue);
> > break;
> > + case IP_RECVERR_RFC4884:
> > + if (val != 0 && val != 1)
> > + goto e_inval;
> > + inet->recverr_rfc4884 = val;
> > + break;
> > case IP_MULTICAST_TTL:
> > if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_STREAM)
> > goto e_inval;
> > @@ -1588,6 +1597,9 @@ static int do_ip_getsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
> > case IP_RECVERR:
> > val = inet->recverr;
> > break;
> > + case IP_RECVERR_RFC4884:
> > + val = inet->recverr_rfc4884;
> > + break;
> > case IP_MULTICAST_TTL:
> > val = inet->mc_ttl;
> > break;
> > --
> > 2.27.0.212.ge8ba1cc988-goog
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists