netdev - Re: [PATCH v1] rds: If one path needs re-connection, check all and re-connect

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200629.122337.481071276474268044.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Mon, 29 Jun 2020 12:23:37 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     rao.shoaib@...cle.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        ka-cheong.poon@...cle.com, david.edmondson@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] rds: If one path needs re-connection, check all and
 re-connect

From: Rao Shoaib <rao.shoaib@...cle.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 10:55:28 -0700

> This was coded in this unusual way because the code is agnostic to the
> underlying transport. Unfortunately, IB transport does not
> initialize/use this field where as TCP does and counts starting from
> one.

Ok, please resubmit, I didn't understand that the conn->c_npaths
could be zero.

Thank you.