netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] cls_flower: Offload unmasked key

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAO+9nP5M2so3QnDPK+ucWG4J5764mbZ+eQ2aKrb9QmOLX7Yo=g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 30 Jun 2020 08:39:54 +0530
From:   Satish <satish.d@...convergence.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
        Jiří Pírko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
        kuba@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>, kesavac@...il.com,
        Prathibha Nagooru <prathibha.nagooru@...convergence.com>,
        Intiyaz Basha <intiyaz.basha@...convergence.com>,
        Jai Rana <jai.rana@...convergence.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] cls_flower: Offload unmasked key

Hi David,

Thank you so much for providing your review comments. We decided to
withdraw this patch for the time being. We'll resubmit this patch
addressing all your comments with the driver code in future".


On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 1:42 AM David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>
>
> You are giving no context on what hardware and with what driver
> your changes make a difference for.
>
> This kind of context and information is required in order for
> anyone to understand your changes.
>
> We're not accepting these changes until you explain all of this.
>
> Thank you.