[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200701150707.222985-3-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 17:06:56 +0200
From: Jerome Pouiller <Jerome.Pouiller@...abs.com>
To: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jérôme Pouiller
<jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>
Subject: [PATCH 02/13] staging: wfx: check the vif ID of the Tx confirmations
From: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>
When the driver has sent a frame on a virtual interface (vif), it
expects to receive the confirmation on the same vif.
This patch add a check for that.
Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>
---
drivers/staging/wfx/queue.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/queue.c b/drivers/staging/wfx/queue.c
index 7ec36598d9a83..6069143369f30 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wfx/queue.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/queue.c
@@ -142,14 +142,18 @@ struct sk_buff *wfx_pending_get(struct wfx_vif *wvif, u32 packet_id)
{
struct wfx_queue *queue;
struct hif_req_tx *req;
+ struct hif_msg *hif;
struct sk_buff *skb;
spin_lock_bh(&wvif->wdev->tx_pending.lock);
skb_queue_walk(&wvif->wdev->tx_pending, skb) {
- req = wfx_skb_txreq(skb);
+ hif = (struct hif_msg *)skb->data;
+ req = (struct hif_req_tx *)hif->body;
if (req->packet_id == packet_id) {
spin_unlock_bh(&wvif->wdev->tx_pending.lock);
queue = &wvif->tx_queue[skb_get_queue_mapping(skb)];
+ WARN(hif->interface != wvif->id, "sent frame %08x on vif %d, but get reply on vif %d",
+ req->packet_id, hif->interface, wvif->id);
WARN_ON(skb_get_queue_mapping(skb) > 3);
WARN_ON(!atomic_read(&queue->pending_frames));
atomic_dec(&queue->pending_frames);
--
2.27.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists