netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/3] Strip away modifiers from BPF skeleton global variables

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 1 Jul 2020 09:08:45 -0700
From:   Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc:     Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Kernel Team <kernel-team@...com>,
        Anton Protopopov <a.s.protopopov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/3] Strip away modifiers from BPF skeleton
 global variables

On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 8:02 AM Alexei Starovoitov
<alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 11:46 PM Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com> wrote:
> >
> > Fix bpftool logic of stripping away const/volatile modifiers for all global
> > variables during BPF skeleton generation. See patch #1 for details on when
> > existing logic breaks and why it's important. Support special .strip_mods=true
> > mode in btf_dump. Add selftests validating that everything works as expected.
>
> Why bother with the flag?

You mean btf_dump should do this always? That's a bit too invasive a
change, I don't like it.

> It looks like bugfix to me.

It can be considered a bug fix for bpftool's skeleton generation, but
it depends on non-trivial changes in libbpf, which are not bug fix per
se, so should probably better go through bpf-next.