lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 12:58:43 +1000 From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>, Jonathan Rajotte-Julien <joraj@...icios.com> Subject: Re: [regression] TCP_MD5SIG on established sockets On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 07:30:43PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > I made this clear in the changelog, do we want comments all over the places ? > Do not get me wrong, we had this bug for years and suddenly this is a > big deal... I thought you were adding a new pair of smp_rmb/smp_wmb. If they already exist in the code then I agree it's not a big deal. But adding a new pair of bogus smp_Xmb's is bad for maintenance. Cheers, -- Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Powered by blists - more mailing lists