netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] mlx4: Mark PM functions as __maybe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200702093601.GB4837@unreal>
Date:   Thu, 2 Jul 2020 12:36:01 +0300
From:   Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To:     Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>
Cc:     Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Vaibhav Gupta <vaibhavgupta40@...il.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] mlx4: Mark PM functions as __maybe_unused

On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 05:19:46PM +0800, Wei Yongjun wrote:
> In certain configurations without power management support, the
> following warnings happen:
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c:4388:12:
>  warning: 'mlx4_resume' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>  4388 | static int mlx4_resume(struct device *dev_d)
>       |            ^~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c:4373:12: warning:
>  'mlx4_suspend' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>  4373 | static int mlx4_suspend(struct device *dev_d)
>       |            ^~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Mark these functions as __maybe_unused to make it clear to the
> compiler that this is going to happen based on the configuration,
> which is the standard for these types of functions.
>
> Fixes: 0e3e206a3e12 ("mlx4: use generic power management")

I can't find this SHA-1, where did you get it?
And why doesn't mlx5 need this change?

Fixes: 86a3e5d02c20 ("net/mlx4_core: Add PCI calls for suspend/resume")

Thanks