netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fixes for stop monitoring disabled devices series

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 3 Jul 2020 13:57:12 +0200
From:   Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@...labora.com>
To:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Vishal Kulkarni <vishal@...lsio.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
        Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>,
        Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
        Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com>,
        Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@...el.com>,
        Intel Linux Wireless <linuxwifi@...el.com>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        Peter Kaestle <peter@...e.net>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
        Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
        Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
        Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...durent.com>,
        Support Opensource <support.opensource@...semi.com>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
        Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@...natech.se>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
        Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@...il.com>,
        Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Allison Randal <allison@...utok.net>,
        Enrico Weigelt <info@...ux.net>,
        Gayatri Kammela <gayatri.kammela@...el.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
        kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fixes for stop monitoring disabled devices series

Hi,

W dniu 03.07.2020 o 13:06, Daniel Lezcano pisze:
> On 03/07/2020 12:43, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote:
>> This short series contains fixes for "Stop monitoring disabled devices"
>> series https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg817861.html
>>
>> Invocation of thermal_zone_device_is_enabled() in acpi/thermal is now
>> redundant, because thermal_zone_device_update() now is capable of
>> handling disabled devices.
>>
>> In imx's ->get_temp() the lock must not be taken, otherwise a deadlock
>> happens. The decision whether explicitly running a measurement cycle
>> is needed is taken based on driver's local irq_enabled variable.
>>
>> Finally, thermal_zone_device_is_enabled() is made available to the
>> core only, as there are no driver users of it.
>>
>> Andrzej Pietrasiewicz (3):
>>    acpi: thermal: Don't call thermal_zone_device_is_enabled()
>>    thermal: imx: Use driver's local data to decide whether to run a
>>      measurement
>>    thermal: Make thermal_zone_device_is_enabled() available to core only
>>
>>   drivers/acpi/thermal.c         | 3 ---
>>   drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c  | 7 ++++---
>>   drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c | 1 -
>>   drivers/thermal/thermal_core.h | 2 ++
>>   include/linux/thermal.h        | 5 -----
>>   5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> Is this series easily merge-able with the other series?
> 

So-so.

Some simple conflicts needed to be resolved.

I have created a branch for you to look at and decide
how far off it is from the original and whether the
original Acked-by/Reviewed-by can be retained.

Note that I might have lost some portions of code
during conflict resolution. It seems to me I haven't
but you know.

The branch:

https://gitlab.collabora.com/andrzej.p/kernel-tests/-/tree/thermal-dont-poll-disabled-for-daniel

The code compiles at each stage on x86_64 + COMPILE_TEST.

Andrzej