[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200704000745.hv4fyewbm4f5ttao@ast-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 17:07:45 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, davem@...emloft.net,
daniel@...earbox.net, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/3] bpf: Populate bpffs with map and prog
iterators
On Fri, Jul 03, 2020 at 01:18:43PM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> > The user mode driver will load BPF Type Formats, create BPF maps, populate BPF
> > maps, load two BPF programs, attach them to BPF iterators, and finally send two
> > bpf_link IDs back to the kernel.
> > The kernel will pin two bpf_links into newly mounted bpffs instance under
> > names "progs" and "maps". These two files become human readable.
> >
> > $ cat /sys/fs/bpf/progs
> > id name pages attached
> > 11 dump_bpf_map 1 bpf_iter_bpf_map
> > 12 dump_bpf_prog 1 bpf_iter_bpf_prog
> > 27 test_pkt_access 1
> > 32 test_main 1 test_pkt_access test_pkt_access
> > 33 test_subprog1 1 test_pkt_access_subprog1 test_pkt_access
> > 34 test_subprog2 1 test_pkt_access_subprog2 test_pkt_access
> > 35 test_subprog3 1 test_pkt_access_subprog3 test_pkt_access
> > 36 new_get_skb_len 1 get_skb_len test_pkt_access
> > 37 new_get_skb_ifi 1 get_skb_ifindex test_pkt_access
> > 38 new_get_constan 1 get_constant test_pkt_access
>
> Do the iterators respect namespace boundaries? Or will I see all
> programs/maps on the host if I cat the file inside a container?
why are you asking? I'm pretty sure you know that bpf infra isn't namespaced yet.
> > Few interesting observations:
> > - though bpffs comes with two human readble files "progs" and "maps" they
> > can be removed. 'rm -f /sys/fs/bpf/progs' will remove bpf_link and kernel
> > will automatically unload corresponding BPF progs, maps, BTFs.
>
> Is there any way to get the files back if one does this by mistake
> (other than re-mounting the bpffs)?
Same as user A pining their prog/map/link in bpffs and user B removing it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists