netdev - Re: [PATCH ghak90 V9 08/13] audit: add containerid support for user records

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 5 Jul 2020 11:11:11 -0400
From:   Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To:     Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
Cc:     containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux-Audit Mailing List <linux-audit@...hat.com>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        sgrubb@...hat.com, Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@...hat.com>,
        dhowells@...hat.com, simo@...hat.com,
        Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>,
        Serge Hallyn <serge@...lyn.com>, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
        nhorman@...driver.com, Dan Walsh <dwalsh@...hat.com>,
        mpatel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH ghak90 V9 08/13] audit: add containerid support for user records

On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 9:23 AM Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Add audit container identifier auxiliary record to user event standalone
> records.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
> Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@...hat.com>
> ---
>  kernel/audit.c | 19 ++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c
> index 54dd2cb69402..997c34178ee8 100644
> --- a/kernel/audit.c
> +++ b/kernel/audit.c
> @@ -1507,6 +1504,14 @@ static int audit_receive_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh)
>                                 audit_log_n_untrustedstring(ab, str, data_len);
>                         }
>                         audit_log_end(ab);
> +                       rcu_read_lock();
> +                       cont = _audit_contobj_get(current);
> +                       rcu_read_unlock();
> +                       audit_log_container_id(context, cont);
> +                       rcu_read_lock();
> +                       _audit_contobj_put(cont);
> +                       rcu_read_unlock();
> +                       audit_free_context(context);

I haven't searched the entire patchset, but it seems like the pattern
above happens a couple of times in this patchset, yes?  If so would it
make sense to wrap the above get/log/put in a helper function?

Not a big deal either way, I'm pretty neutral on it at this point in
the patchset but thought it might be worth mentioning in case you
noticed the same and were on the fence.

--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com