| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2020 17:57:20 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
David Miller <davem@...hat.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Wenbo Zhang <ethercflow@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
Brendan Gregg <bgregg@...flix.com>,
Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 bpf-next 9/9] selftests/bpf: Add test for
resolve_btfids
On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 06:26:28PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 2:54 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Adding resolve_btfids test under test_progs suite.
> >
> > It's possible to use btf_ids.h header and its logic in
> > user space application, so we can add easy test for it.
> >
> > The test defines BTF_ID_LIST and checks it gets properly
> > resolved.
> >
> > For this reason the test_progs binary (and other binaries
> > that use TRUNNER* macros) is processed with resolve_btfids
> > tool, which resolves BTF IDs in .BTF.ids section.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 22 ++-
> > .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/resolve_btfids.c | 170 ++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 190 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/resolve_btfids.c
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> > index 1f9c696b3edf..b47a685d12bd 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> > @@ -190,6 +190,16 @@ else
> > cp "$(VMLINUX_H)" $@
> > endif
> >
> > +$(SCRATCH_DIR)/resolve_btfids: $(BPFOBJ) \
> > + $(TOOLSDIR)/bpf/resolve_btfids/main.c \
> > + $(TOOLSDIR)/lib/rbtree.c \
> > + $(TOOLSDIR)/lib/zalloc.c \
> > + $(TOOLSDIR)/lib/string.c \
> > + $(TOOLSDIR)/lib/ctype.c \
> > + $(TOOLSDIR)/lib/str_error_r.c
> > + $(Q)$(MAKE) $(submake_extras) -C $(TOOLSDIR)/bpf/resolve_btfids \
> > + OUTPUT=$(SCRATCH_DIR)/ BPFOBJ=$(BPFOBJ)
> > +
>
> please indent OUTPUT, so it doesn't look like it's a separate command
ok
>
> > # Get Clang's default includes on this system, as opposed to those seen by
> > # '-target bpf'. This fixes "missing" files on some architectures/distros,
> > # such as asm/byteorder.h, asm/socket.h, asm/sockios.h, sys/cdefs.h etc.
> > @@ -333,7 +343,8 @@ $(TRUNNER_TEST_OBJS): $(TRUNNER_OUTPUT)/%.test.o: \
> > $(TRUNNER_BPF_SKELS) \
> > $$(BPFOBJ) | $(TRUNNER_OUTPUT)
> > $$(call msg,TEST-OBJ,$(TRUNNER_BINARY),$$@)
> > - cd $$(@D) && $$(CC) -I. $$(CFLAGS) -c $(CURDIR)/$$< $$(LDLIBS) -o $$(@F)
> > + cd $$(@D) && $$(CC) -I. $$(CFLAGS) $(TRUNNER_EXTRA_CFLAGS) \
> > + -c $(CURDIR)/$$< $$(LDLIBS) -o $$(@F)
> >
> > $(TRUNNER_EXTRA_OBJS): $(TRUNNER_OUTPUT)/%.o: \
> > %.c \
> > @@ -355,6 +366,7 @@ $(OUTPUT)/$(TRUNNER_BINARY): $(TRUNNER_TEST_OBJS) \
> > | $(TRUNNER_BINARY)-extras
> > $$(call msg,BINARY,,$$@)
> > $$(CC) $$(CFLAGS) $$(filter %.a %.o,$$^) $$(LDLIBS) -o $$@
> > + $(TRUNNER_BINARY_EXTRA_CMD)
>
> no need to make this generic, just write out resolve_btfids here explicitly
currently resolve_btfids fails if there's no .BTF.ids section found,
but we can make it silently pass i nthis case and then we can invoke
it for all the binaries
>
> >
> > endef
> >
> > @@ -365,7 +377,10 @@ TRUNNER_EXTRA_SOURCES := test_progs.c cgroup_helpers.c trace_helpers.c \
> > network_helpers.c testing_helpers.c \
> > flow_dissector_load.h
> > TRUNNER_EXTRA_FILES := $(OUTPUT)/urandom_read \
> > - $(wildcard progs/btf_dump_test_case_*.c)
> > + $(wildcard progs/btf_dump_test_case_*.c) \
> > + $(SCRATCH_DIR)/resolve_btfids
> > +TRUNNER_EXTRA_CFLAGS := -D"BUILD_STR(s)=\#s" -DVMLINUX_BTF="BUILD_STR($(VMLINUX_BTF))"
> > +TRUNNER_BINARY_EXTRA_CMD := $(SCRATCH_DIR)/resolve_btfids --btf $(VMLINUX_BTF) test_progs
>
> I hope we can get rid of this, see suggestion below.
>
> > TRUNNER_BPF_BUILD_RULE := CLANG_BPF_BUILD_RULE
> > TRUNNER_BPF_CFLAGS := $(BPF_CFLAGS) $(CLANG_CFLAGS)
> > TRUNNER_BPF_LDFLAGS := -mattr=+alu32
> > @@ -373,6 +388,7 @@ $(eval $(call DEFINE_TEST_RUNNER,test_progs))
> >
>
> [...]
>
> > +
> > +static int duration;
> > +
> > +static struct btf *btf__parse_raw(const char *file)
>
> another copy here...
ok
>
> > +{
> > + struct btf *btf;
> > + struct stat st;
> > + __u8 *buf;
> > + FILE *f;
> > +
>
> [...]
>
> > +
> > +BTF_ID_LIST(test_list)
> > +BTF_ID_UNUSED
> > +BTF_ID(typedef, pid_t)
> > +BTF_ID(struct, sk_buff)
> > +BTF_ID(union, thread_union)
> > +BTF_ID(func, memcpy)
> > +
> > +struct symbol {
> > + const char *name;
> > + int type;
> > + int id;
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct symbol test_symbols[] = {
> > + { "unused", -1, 0 },
>
> could use BTF_KIND_UNKN here instead of -1
ok
>
> > + { "pid_t", BTF_KIND_TYPEDEF, -1 },
> > + { "sk_buff", BTF_KIND_STRUCT, -1 },
> > + { "thread_union", BTF_KIND_UNION, -1 },
> > + { "memcpy", BTF_KIND_FUNC, -1 },
> > +};
> > +
>
> [...]
>
> > +
> > +static int resolve_symbols(void)
> > +{
> > + const char *path = VMLINUX_BTF;
>
>
> This build-time parameter passing to find the original VMLINUX_BTF
> really sucks, IMO.
>
> Why not use the btf_dump tests approach and have our own small
> "vmlinux BTF", which resolve_btfids would use to resolve these IDs?
> See how btf_dump_xxx.c files define BTFs that are used in tests. You
> can do something similar here, and use a well-known BPF object file as
> a source of BTF, both here in a test and in Makefile for --btf param
> to resolve_btfids?
well VMLINUX_BTF is there and those types are used are not going
away any time soon ;-) but yea, we can do that.. we do this also
for bpftrace, it's nicer
jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists