[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2020 03:32:47 +0000
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
To: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"bigeasy@...utronix.de" <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"leon@...nel.org" <leon@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/mlx5e: Do not include rwlock.h directly
On Fri, 2020-07-03 at 18:44 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> rwlock.h should not be included directly. Instead linux/splinlock.h
> should be included. Including it directly will break the RT build.
>
> Fixes: 549c243e4e010 ("net/mlx5e: Extract neigh-specific code from
> en_rep.c to rep/neigh.c")
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
> ---
> It would be nice if this could get into v5.8 since this include has
> been
> added in v5.8-rc1.
>
I don't mind applying this to net.
Acked-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists