[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200708.153729.1570943134510183928.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2020 15:37:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: jarod@...hat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, huyn@...lanox.com,
saeedm@...lanox.com, j.vosburgh@...il.com, vfalico@...il.com,
andy@...yhouse.net, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, kuba@...nel.org,
steffen.klassert@...unet.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bonding: deal with xfrm state in all modes
and add more error-checking
From: Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2020 13:46:31 -0400
> It's possible that device removal happens when the bond is in non-AB mode,
> and addition happens in AB mode, so bond_ipsec_del_sa() never gets called,
> which leaves security associations in an odd state if bond_ipsec_add_sa()
> then gets called after switching the bond into AB. Just call add and
> delete universally for all modes to keep things consistent.
>
> However, it's also possible that this code gets called when the system is
> shutting down, and the xfrm subsystem has already been disconnected from
> the bond device, so we need to do some error-checking and bail, lest we
> hit a null ptr deref.
>
> Fixes: a3b658cfb664 ("bonding: allow xfrm offload setup post-module-load")
> Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>
Applied, thanks Jarod.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists