netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 3/3] octeontx2-pf: Add support for PTP clock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALHRZupLPK22=fia+sRNG5k0HDe7xjxfCOB+tFN5fhZOf4K_-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 9 Jul 2020 18:24:42 +0530
From:   sundeep subbaraya <sundeep.lkml@...il.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, richardcochran@...il.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, sgoutham@...vell.com,
        Aleksey Makarov <amakarov@...vell.com>,
        Subbaraya Sundeep <sbhatta@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 3/3] octeontx2-pf: Add support for PTP clock

Hi Jakub,

On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 11:10 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed,  8 Jul 2020 22:20:18 +0530 sundeep.lkml@...il.com wrote:
> > From: Aleksey Makarov <amakarov@...vell.com>
> >
> > This patch adds PTP clock and uses it in Octeontx2
> > network device. PTP clock uses mailbox calls to
> > access the hardware counter on the RVU side.
> >
> > Co-developed-by: Subbaraya Sundeep <sbhatta@...vell.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Subbaraya Sundeep <sbhatta@...vell.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Aleksey Makarov <amakarov@...vell.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>
>
> Please address the new sparse warnings as well:
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_txrx.c:130:42: warning: cast to restricted __be64
>
Sure. There are some already existing in octeontx2/ for those I will
fix and submit after this patch set.

> > +static inline void otx2_set_rxtstamp(struct otx2_nic *pfvf,
> > +                                  struct sk_buff *skb, void *data)
> > +{
>
> Please don't use static inline in C files, compiler will know which
> static functions to inline, and static inline covers up unused code.
>
Sure.

Thanks,
Sundeep

> > +     u64 tsns;
> > +     int err;
> > +
> > +     if (!(pfvf->flags & OTX2_FLAG_RX_TSTAMP_ENABLED))
> > +             return;
> > +
> > +     /* The first 8 bytes is the timestamp */
> > +     err = otx2_ptp_tstamp2time(pfvf, be64_to_cpu(*(u64 *)data), &tsns);
> > +     if (err)
> > +             return;
> > +
> > +     skb_hwtstamps(skb)->hwtstamp = ns_to_ktime(tsns);
> > +}