| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <87fta0adlo.fsf@cloudflare.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2020 17:54:11 +0200
From: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-team <kernel-team@...udflare.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 16/16] selftests/bpf: Tests for BPF_SK_LOOKUP attach point
On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 06:28 AM CEST, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 6:00 AM Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 01:01 PM CEST, Lorenz Bauer wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2 Jul 2020 at 10:24, Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Add tests to test_progs that exercise:
>> >>
>> >> - attaching/detaching/querying programs to BPF_SK_LOOKUP hook,
>> >> - redirecting socket lookup to a socket selected by BPF program,
>> >> - failing a socket lookup on BPF program's request,
>> >> - error scenarios for selecting a socket from BPF program,
>> >> - accessing BPF program context,
>> >> - attaching and running multiple BPF programs.
>> >>
>> >> Run log:
>> >> | # ./test_progs -n 68
>> >> | #68/1 query lookup prog:OK
>> >> | #68/2 TCP IPv4 redir port:OK
>> >> | #68/3 TCP IPv4 redir addr:OK
>> >> | #68/4 TCP IPv4 redir with reuseport:OK
>> >> | #68/5 TCP IPv4 redir skip reuseport:OK
>> >> | #68/6 TCP IPv6 redir port:OK
>> >> | #68/7 TCP IPv6 redir addr:OK
>> >> | #68/8 TCP IPv4->IPv6 redir port:OK
>> >> | #68/9 TCP IPv6 redir with reuseport:OK
>> >> | #68/10 TCP IPv6 redir skip reuseport:OK
>> >> | #68/11 UDP IPv4 redir port:OK
>> >> | #68/12 UDP IPv4 redir addr:OK
>> >> | #68/13 UDP IPv4 redir with reuseport:OK
>> >> | #68/14 UDP IPv4 redir skip reuseport:OK
>> >> | #68/15 UDP IPv6 redir port:OK
>> >> | #68/16 UDP IPv6 redir addr:OK
>> >> | #68/17 UDP IPv4->IPv6 redir port:OK
>> >> | #68/18 UDP IPv6 redir and reuseport:OK
>> >> | #68/19 UDP IPv6 redir skip reuseport:OK
>> >> | #68/20 TCP IPv4 drop on lookup:OK
>> >> | #68/21 TCP IPv6 drop on lookup:OK
>> >> | #68/22 UDP IPv4 drop on lookup:OK
>> >> | #68/23 UDP IPv6 drop on lookup:OK
>> >> | #68/24 TCP IPv4 drop on reuseport:OK
>> >> | #68/25 TCP IPv6 drop on reuseport:OK
>> >> | #68/26 UDP IPv4 drop on reuseport:OK
>> >> | #68/27 TCP IPv6 drop on reuseport:OK
>> >> | #68/28 sk_assign returns EEXIST:OK
>> >> | #68/29 sk_assign honors F_REPLACE:OK
>> >> | #68/30 access ctx->sk:OK
>> >> | #68/31 sk_assign rejects TCP established:OK
>> >> | #68/32 sk_assign rejects UDP connected:OK
>> >> | #68/33 multi prog - pass, pass:OK
>> >> | #68/34 multi prog - pass, inval:OK
>> >> | #68/35 multi prog - inval, pass:OK
>> >> | #68/36 multi prog - drop, drop:OK
>> >> | #68/37 multi prog - pass, drop:OK
>> >> | #68/38 multi prog - drop, pass:OK
>> >> | #68/39 multi prog - drop, inval:OK
>> >> | #68/40 multi prog - inval, drop:OK
>> >> | #68/41 multi prog - pass, redir:OK
>> >> | #68/42 multi prog - redir, pass:OK
>> >> | #68/43 multi prog - drop, redir:OK
>> >> | #68/44 multi prog - redir, drop:OK
>> >> | #68/45 multi prog - inval, redir:OK
>> >> | #68/46 multi prog - redir, inval:OK
>> >> | #68/47 multi prog - redir, redir:OK
>> >> | #68 sk_lookup:OK
>> >> | Summary: 1/47 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
>> >> ---
>> >>
>> >> Notes:
>> >> v3:
>> >> - Extend tests to cover new functionality in v3:
>> >> - multi-prog attachments (query, running, verdict precedence)
>> >> - socket selecting for the second time with bpf_sk_assign
>> >> - skipping over reuseport load-balancing
>> >>
>> >> v2:
>> >> - Adjust for fields renames in struct bpf_sk_lookup.
>> >>
>> >> .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sk_lookup.c | 1353 +++++++++++++++++
>> >> .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_sk_lookup_kern.c | 399 +++++
>> >> 2 files changed, 1752 insertions(+)
>> >> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sk_lookup.c
>> >> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sk_lookup_kern.c
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sk_lookup.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sk_lookup.c
>> >> new file mode 100644
>> >> index 000000000000..2859dc7e65b0
>> >> --- /dev/null
>> >> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sk_lookup.c
>>
>> [...]
>>
>
> [...]
>
>> >> +static void run_lookup_prog(const struct test *t)
>> >> +{
>> >> + int client_fd, server_fds[MAX_SERVERS] = { -1 };
>> >> + struct bpf_link *lookup_link;
>> >> + int i, err;
>> >> +
>> >> + lookup_link = attach_lookup_prog(t->lookup_prog);
>> >> + if (!lookup_link)
>> >
>> > Why doesn't this fail the test? Same for the other error paths in the
>> > function, and the other helpers.
>>
>> I took the approach of placing CHECK_FAIL checks only right after the
>> failure point. So a syscall or a call to libbpf.
>>
>> This way if I'm calling a helper, I know it already fails the test if
>> anything goes wrong, and I can have less CHECK_FAILs peppered over the
>> code.
>
> Please prefere CHECK() over CHECK_FAIL(), unless you are making
> hundreds of checks and it's extremely unlikely they will ever fail.
> Using CHECK_FAIL makes even knowing where the test fails hard. CHECK()
> leaves a trail, so it's easier to pinpoint what and why failed.
I'll convert it in v4. I wrote most of these tests before we chatted
about CHECK vs CHECK_FAIL some time ago and just haven't gotten around
to it so far.
>
>
> [...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists