netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] net: sched: Lockless Token Bucket (LTB) qdisc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c4796548-5c3b-f3db-a060-1e46fb42970a@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 8 Jul 2020 18:24:09 -0700
From:   Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:     "YU, Xiangning" <xiangning.yu@...baba-inc.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] net: sched: Lockless Token Bucket (LTB)
 qdisc



On 7/8/20 5:58 PM, YU, Xiangning wrote:
> 
> 
> On 7/8/20 5:08 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 7/8/20 4:59 PM, YU, Xiangning wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Yes, we are touching a cache line here to make sure aggregation tasklet is scheduled immediately. In most cases it is a call to test_and_set_bit(). 
>>
>>
>> test_and_set_bit() is dirtying the cache line even if the bit is already set.
>>
> 
> Yes. I do hope we can avoid this.
> 
>>>
>>> We might be able to do some inline processing without tasklet here, still we need to make sure the aggregation won't run simultaneously on multiple CPUs. 
>>
>> I am actually surprised you can reach 8 Mpps with so many cache line bouncing around.
>>
>> If you replace the ltb qdisc with standard mq+pfifo_fast, what kind of throughput do you get ?
>>
> 
> Just tried it using pktgen, we are far from baseline. I can get 13Mpps with 10 threads in my test setup.

This is quite low performance.

I suspect your 10 threads are sharing a smaller number of TX queues perhaps ?