netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 00/10] udp_tunnel: add NIC RX port offload infrastructure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200709135158.5567f476@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Thu, 9 Jul 2020 13:51:58 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, saeedm@...lanox.com,
        michael.chan@...adcom.com, edwin.peer@...adcom.com,
        emil.s.tantilov@...el.com, alexander.h.duyck@...ux.intel.com,
        jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, tariqt@...lanox.com, mkubecek@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 00/10] udp_tunnel: add NIC RX port offload
 infrastructure

On Thu, 09 Jul 2020 11:23:46 -0700 (PDT) David Miller wrote:
> Looks like we get a build failure if IPV4=n and ETHTOOL_NL=y because
> the code unconditionally references the udp tunnel ops from the
> ethtool tunnel stuff.

I see :S 

I think I'll cut out the entire ETHTOOL_MSG_TUNNEL_INFO_GET support if
IPv4=n, theoretically there could be an non-IP tunnel info we want to
report, but we can deal with that (unlikely) case later.