netdev - Re: [PATCH net] cgroup: Fix sock_cgroup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200710.134747.830440492796528440.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Fri, 10 Jul 2020 13:47:47 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     kuba@...nel.org
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
        linux@...ck-us.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] cgroup: Fix sock_cgroup_data on big-endian.

From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 17:03:20 -0700

> On Thu, 09 Jul 2020 16:32:35 -0700 (PDT) David Miller wrote:
>> From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
>> 
>> In order for no_refcnt and is_data to be the lowest order two
>> bits in the 'val' we have to pad out the bitfield of the u8.
>> 
>> Fixes: ad0f75e5f57c ("cgroup: fix cgroup_sk_alloc() for sk_clone_lock()")
>> Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
>> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> 
> FWIW Cong's listed in From: but there's no sign-off from him so the
> signoff checking script may get upset about this one.

I wonder how I should handle that situation though?  I want to give
Cong credit for the change, and not take full credit for it myself.