lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f26ce874-dd33-5283-62ff-334c0c611d09@alibaba-inc.com>
Date:   Fri, 10 Jul 2020 14:06:53 +0800
From:   "YU, Xiangning" <xiangning.yu@...baba-inc.com>
To:     Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: sched: Lockless Token Bucket (LTB)
 Qdisc


On 7/9/20 10:20 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 10:04 PM Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> wrote:
>> IOW, without these *additional* efforts, it is broken in terms of
>> out-of-order.
>>
> 
> Take a look at fq_codel, it provides a hash function for flow classification,
> fq_codel_hash(), as default, thus its default configuration does not
> have such issues. So, you probably want to provide such a hash
> function too instead of a default class.
> 
If I understand this code correctly, this socket hash value identifies a flow. Essentially it serves the same purpose as socket priority. In this patch, we use a similar classification method like htb, but without filters.

We could provide a hash function, but I'm a bit confused about the problem we are trying to solve.

Thanks,
- Xiangning

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ