[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6282b6d5-4d2b-a996-c090-6bc7ae6043ce@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 14:44:08 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Eugenio Perez Martin <eperezma@...hat.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v8 02/11] vhost: use batched get_vq_desc version
On 2020/7/10 下午1:39, Eugenio Perez Martin wrote:
> It is allocated 1 thread in lcore 1 (F_THREAD=1) which belongs to the
> same NUMA as testpmd. Actually, it is the testpmd master core, so it
> should be a good idea to move it to another lcore of the same NUMA
> node.
>
> Is this enough for pktgen to allocate the memory in that numa node?
> Since the script only write parameters to /proc, I assume that it has
> no effect to run it under numactl/taskset, and pktgen will allocate
> memory based on the lcore is running. Am I right?
>
> Thanks!
>
I think you're right.
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists