[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200711190543.GT1014141@lunn.ch>
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2020 21:05:43 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, min.li.xe@...esas.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ptp: add debugfs support for IDT family of
timing devices
On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 11:38:39AM -0700, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 06:38:06PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > But configuration does not belong in debugfs. It would be good to
> > explain what is being configured by these parameters, then we can
> > maybe make a suggestion about the correct API to use.
>
> Can we at least enumerate the possibilities?
>
> - driver specific char device
> - private ioctls
> - debugfs
Hi Richard
Since nobody has explained what is actually being configured here, the
list is long, and is very likely to contain all sorts of wrong ways of
doing it:
A new generic parameter added to the PTP API which other PTP clock
providers could use.
A device tree property.
A device tree clock, regulator, ...
An ACPI property?
A sysfs file.
A module parameter
A new POSIX clock?
An LED class device?
A netlink attribute?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists