netdev - Re: 88E6176 dsa switch on ls1021a (GIANFAR)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aa7fcc92-691a-0aad-c77e-f1a9a10f3468@inbox.ru>
Date:   Mon, 13 Jul 2020 14:52:03 +0300
From:   Maxim Kochetkov <fido_max@...ox.ru>
To:     Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, vivien.didelot@...il.com,
        claudiu.manoil@....com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 88E6176 dsa switch on ls1021a (GIANFAR)

Sorry that was my mistake. That was my own custom patch for bridge (for 
some old board).
Thank you very much!

13.07.2020 14:20, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> This call path is interesting. How does br_fdb_update() end up calling
> dsa_legacy_fdb_add(), which is only accessible through .ndo_fdb_add? The
> only call path I see in the mainline kernel for .ndo_fdb_add() is from
> rtnl_fdb_add(), which seems to not be called here.