netdev - [PATCH bpf-next 2/4] bpf: allow to specify ifindex for skb in bpf_prog_test_run

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200713182520.97606-3-zeil@yandex-team.ru>
Date:   Mon, 13 Jul 2020 21:25:18 +0300
From:   Dmitry Yakunin <zeil@...dex-team.ru>
To:     alexei.starovoitov@...il.com, daniel@...earbox.net,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     sdf@...gle.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 2/4] bpf: allow to specify ifindex for skb in bpf_prog_test_run_skb

Now skb->dev is unconditionally set to the loopback device in current net
namespace. But if we want to test bpf program which contains code branch
based on ifindex condition (eg filters out localhost packets) it is useful
to allow specifying of ifindex from userspace. This patch adds such option
through ctx_in (__sk_buff) parameter.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Yakunin <zeil@...dex-team.ru>
---
 net/bpf/test_run.c                               | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/skb_ctx.c |  5 +++++
 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
index a58b399..1e10a7e 100644
--- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
+++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
@@ -310,6 +310,12 @@ static int convert___skb_to_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, struct __sk_buff *__skb)
 	/* priority is allowed */
 
 	if (!range_is_zero(__skb, offsetofend(struct __sk_buff, priority),
+			   offsetof(struct __sk_buff, ifindex)))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	/* ifindex is allowed */
+
+	if (!range_is_zero(__skb, offsetofend(struct __sk_buff, ifindex),
 			   offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb)))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
@@ -364,6 +370,7 @@ static void convert_skb_to___skb(struct sk_buff *skb, struct __sk_buff *__skb)
 
 	__skb->mark = skb->mark;
 	__skb->priority = skb->priority;
+	__skb->ifindex = skb->dev->ifindex;
 	__skb->tstamp = skb->tstamp;
 	memcpy(__skb->cb, &cb->data, QDISC_CB_PRIV_LEN);
 	__skb->wire_len = cb->pkt_len;
@@ -374,6 +381,8 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_skb(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr,
 			  union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
 {
 	bool is_l2 = false, is_direct_pkt_access = false;
+	struct net *net = current->nsproxy->net_ns;
+	struct net_device *dev = net->loopback_dev;
 	u32 size = kattr->test.data_size_in;
 	u32 repeat = kattr->test.repeat;
 	struct __sk_buff *ctx = NULL;
@@ -415,7 +424,7 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_skb(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr,
 		kfree(ctx);
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	}
-	sock_net_set(sk, current->nsproxy->net_ns);
+	sock_net_set(sk, net);
 	sock_init_data(NULL, sk);
 
 	skb = build_skb(data, 0);
@@ -429,7 +438,14 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_skb(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr,
 
 	skb_reserve(skb, NET_SKB_PAD + NET_IP_ALIGN);
 	__skb_put(skb, size);
-	skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, current->nsproxy->net_ns->loopback_dev);
+	if (ctx && ctx->ifindex > 1) {
+		dev = dev_get_by_index(net, ctx->ifindex);
+		if (!dev) {
+			ret = -ENODEV;
+			goto out;
+		}
+	}
+	skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, dev);
 	skb_reset_network_header(skb);
 
 	switch (skb->protocol) {
@@ -479,6 +495,8 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_skb(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr,
 		ret = bpf_ctx_finish(kattr, uattr, ctx,
 				     sizeof(struct __sk_buff));
 out:
+	if (dev && dev != net->loopback_dev)
+		dev_put(dev);
 	kfree_skb(skb);
 	bpf_sk_storage_free(sk);
 	kfree(sk);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/skb_ctx.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/skb_ctx.c
index 7021b92..25de86a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/skb_ctx.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/skb_ctx.c
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ void test_skb_ctx(void)
 		.cb[3] = 4,
 		.cb[4] = 5,
 		.priority = 6,
+		.ifindex = 1,
 		.tstamp = 7,
 		.wire_len = 100,
 		.gso_segs = 8,
@@ -92,6 +93,10 @@ void test_skb_ctx(void)
 		   "ctx_out_priority",
 		   "skb->priority == %d, expected %d\n",
 		   skb.priority, 7);
+	CHECK_ATTR(skb.ifindex != 1,
+		   "ctx_out_ifindex",
+		   "skb->ifindex == %d, expected %d\n",
+		   skb.ifindex, 1);
 	CHECK_ATTR(skb.tstamp != 8,
 		   "ctx_out_tstamp",
 		   "skb->tstamp == %lld, expected %d\n",
-- 
2.7.4