[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <276bf939-8e12-e28a-64f7-1767851e0db5@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 16:28:57 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@...el.com>, mst@...hat.com,
alex.williamson@...hat.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
sean.j.christopherson@...el.com, wanpengli@...cent.com
Cc: virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, dan.daly@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] virtio_vdpa: init IRQ offloading function pointers to
NULL.
On 2020/7/12 下午10:49, Zhu Lingshan wrote:
> This commit initialize IRQ offloading function pointers in
> virtio_vdpa_driver to NULL. Becasue irq offloading only focus
> on VMs for vhost_vdpa.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/virtio/virtio_vdpa.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_vdpa.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_vdpa.c
> index c30eb55..1e8acb9 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_vdpa.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_vdpa.c
> @@ -386,6 +386,8 @@ static void virtio_vdpa_remove(struct vdpa_device *vdpa)
> },
> .probe = virtio_vdpa_probe,
> .remove = virtio_vdpa_remove,
> + .setup_vq_irq = NULL,
> + .unsetup_vq_irq = NULL,
> };
Is this really needed consider the it's static?
Thanks
>
> module_vdpa_driver(virtio_vdpa_driver);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists