lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 12 Jul 2020 21:17:55 -0700
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, broonie@...nel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org, mhocko@...e.cz,
        mm-commits@...r.kernel.org,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>,
        "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: mmotm 2020-07-09-21-00 uploaded
 (drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c)

On 7/12/20 9:02 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Randy,
> 
> On Fri, 10 Jul 2020 10:40:29 -0700 Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
>>
>> on i386:
>>
>> In file included from ../drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c:49:0:
>> ../drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/en_accel.h: In function ‘mlx5e_accel_sk_get_rxq’:
>> ../drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/en_accel.h:153:12: error: implicit declaration of function ‘sk_rx_queue_get’; did you mean ‘sk_rx_queue_set’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>   int rxq = sk_rx_queue_get(sk);
>>             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>             sk_rx_queue_set
> 
> Caused by commit
> 
>   1182f3659357 ("net/mlx5e: kTLS, Add kTLS RX HW offload support")
> 
> from the net-next tree.  Presumably CONFIG_XPS is not set.

Yes, that's correct.

-- 
~Randy

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ