[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdXM3qf266exJtJrN0XAogEsJoM-k3FON9CjX+stLpuMFA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 10:41:47 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
Cc: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
dmaengine <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux IOMMU <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] iommu/ipmmu-vmsa: Hook up R8A774E1 DT matching code
Hi Prabhakar,
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 10:30 AM Lad, Prabhakar
<prabhakar.csengg@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 9:09 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 11:35 PM Lad Prabhakar
> > <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com> wrote:
> > > From: Marian-Cristian Rotariu <marian-cristian.rotariu.rb@...renesas.com>
> > >
> > > Add support for RZ/G2H (R8A774E1) SoC IPMMUs.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Marian-Cristian Rotariu <marian-cristian.rotariu.rb@...renesas.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> >
> > Thanks for your patch!
> >
> > > --- a/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c
> > > @@ -751,6 +751,7 @@ static const struct soc_device_attribute soc_rcar_gen3[] = {
> > > static const struct soc_device_attribute soc_rcar_gen3_whitelist[] = {
> > > { .soc_id = "r8a774b1", },
> > > { .soc_id = "r8a774c0", },
> > > + { .soc_id = "r8a774e1", },
> >
> > Adding an entry to soc_rcar_gen3_whitelist[] doesn't do anything, unless
> > you also add the same entry to soc_rcar_gen3[].
> >
> I think the comment "For R-Car Gen3 use a white list to opt-in slave
> devices." is misleading. Booting through the kernel I do see iommu
> groups (attached is the logs).
Indeed. Without an entry in soc_rcar_gen3[], the IPMMU is enabled
unconditionally, and soc_rcar_gen3_whitelist[] is ignored.
That's why you want an entry in both, unless you have an R-Car Gen3
SoC where the IPMMU works correctly with all slave devices present.
Perhaps soc_rcar_gen3[] should be renamed to soc_rcar_gen3_greylist[]
(or soc_rcar_gen3_maybelist[]) to make this clear?
> Also the recent patch to add
> "r8a77961" just adds to soc_rcar_gen3_whitelist.
Oops, commit 17fe16181639801b ("iommu/renesas: Add support for r8a77961")
did it wrong, too.
> > > { .soc_id = "r8a7795", .revision = "ES3.*" },
> > > { .soc_id = "r8a77961", },
> > > { .soc_id = "r8a77965", },
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists