Message-ID: <87imeqgtzy.fsf@toke.dk>
Date:   Tue, 14 Jul 2020 14:29:21 +0200
From:   Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
To:     Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
        Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@...hat.com>, ast@...nel.org,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@...hat.com>,
        Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 bpf-next 0/3] xdp: add a new helper for dev map multicast support

Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com> writes:

> This patch is for xdp multicast support. which has been discussed before[0],
> The goal is to be able to implement an OVS-like data plane in XDP, i.e.,
> a software switch that can forward XDP frames to multiple ports.
>
> To achieve this, an application needs to specify a group of interfaces
> to forward a packet to. It is also common to want to exclude one or more
> physical interfaces from the forwarding operation - e.g., to forward a
> packet to all interfaces in the multicast group except the interface it
> arrived on. While this could be done simply by adding more groups, this
> quickly leads to a combinatorial explosion in the number of groups an
> application has to maintain.
>
> To avoid the combinatorial explosion, we propose to include the ability
> to specify an "exclude group" as part of the forwarding operation. This
> needs to be a group (instead of just a single port index), because there
> may have multi interfaces you want to exclude.
>
> Thus, the logical forwarding operation becomes a "set difference"
> operation, i.e. "forward to all ports in group A that are not also in
> group B". This series implements such an operation using device maps to
> represent the groups. This means that the XDP program specifies two
> device maps, one containing the list of netdevs to redirect to, and the
> other containing the exclude list.
>
> To achieve this, I re-implement a new helper bpf_redirect_map_multi()
> to accept two maps, the forwarding map and exclude map. If user
> don't want to use exclude map and just want simply stop redirecting back
> to ingress device, they can use flag BPF_F_EXCLUDE_INGRESS.
>
> The 2nd and 3rd patches are for usage sample and testing purpose, so there
> is no effort has been made on performance optimisation. I did same tests
> with pktgen(pkt size 64) to compire with xdp_redirect_map(). Here is the
> test result(the veth peer has a dummy xdp program with XDP_DROP directly):
>
> Version         | Test                                   | Native | Generic
> 5.8 rc1         | xdp_redirect_map       i40e->i40e      |  10.0M |   1.9M
> 5.8 rc1         | xdp_redirect_map       i40e->veth      |  12.7M |   1.6M
> 5.8 rc1 + patch | xdp_redirect_map       i40e->i40e      |  10.0M |   1.9M
> 5.8 rc1 + patch | xdp_redirect_map       i40e->veth      |  12.3M |   1.6M
> 5.8 rc1 + patch | xdp_redirect_map_multi i40e->i40e      |   7.2M |   1.5M
> 5.8 rc1 + patch | xdp_redirect_map_multi i40e->veth      |   8.5M |   1.3M
> 5.8 rc1 + patch | xdp_redirect_map_multi i40e->i40e+veth |   3.0M |  0.98M
>
> The bpf_redirect_map_multi() is slower than bpf_redirect_map() as we loop
> the arrays and do clone skb/xdpf. The native path is slower than generic
> path as we send skbs by pktgen. So the result looks reasonable.
>
> Last but not least, thanks a lot to Jiri, Eelco, Toke and Jesper for
> suggestions and help on implementation.
>
> [0] https://xdp-project.net/#Handling-multicast
>
> v7: Fix helper flag check
>     Limit the *ex_map* to use DEVMAP_HASH only and update function
>     dev_in_exclude_map() to get better performance.

Did it help? The performance numbers in the table above are the same as
in v6...

-Toke

Powered by blists - more mailing lists