lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 14 Jul 2020 11:13:18 -0400
From:   Wxcafé <wxcafe@...afe.net>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Miguel Rodríguez Pérez 
        <miguel@....uvigo.gal>, oliver@...kum.org,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] Simplify usbnet_cdc_update_filter

Hi Greg,

Thanks for your feedback! I'm not sure what you mean by "a format they
can be applied in", I'm guessing as three emails, with a single patch
each?

As for the issues that you mention, I'm guessing you mean applying v4
of Miguel's patches as found here (
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10501163/, 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10507009/) rather than v3 as I did
here (I didn't notice there was a v4 fixing those issues, and reading
the previous messages in this thread I assumed they weren't considered
blocking. Or is there a problem left with v4 of the patches? There
doesn't seem to be any replies to the messages from 2 years ago)

Sorry for all my questions, I'm totally new to all this process...

Cheers

On Tue, 2020-07-14 at 08:06 +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 04:43:11PM -0400, Wxcafé wrote:
> > Hey,
> > 
> > I've encountered that same problem a few days ago, found this
> > thread
> > and these (unmerged) patches, "ported" them to a more current
> > version
> > of the kernel (wasn't much work, let's be honest), and I was
> > wondering
> > if it would be possible to get them merged, because this is still a
> > problem with cdc_ncm.
> > 
> > Here's the three "up to date" patches (based on 5.8-rc5), they work
> > insofar as I'm running with them, the bug isn't there anymore (I
> > get
> > ethernet multicast packets correctly), and there's no obvious bug.
> > I'm
> > not a dev though, so I have no idea if these are formatted
> > correctly,
> > if the patch separation is correct, or anything like that, I just
> > think
> > it would be great if this could be merged into mainline!
> 
> You need to submit them in a format they can be applied in, as well
> as
> taking care of the issues that caused Oliver to not agree with them.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
-- 
Wxcafé <wxcafe@...afe.net>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ