netdev - Re: [net-next 1/5] ice: add the virtchnl handler for AdminQ command

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 15 Jul 2020 11:03:31 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     "Wang, Haiyue" <haiyue.wang@...el.com>
Cc:     "Nguyen, Anthony L" <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "nhorman@...hat.com" <nhorman@...hat.com>,
        "sassmann@...hat.com" <sassmann@...hat.com>,
        "Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
        "Lu, Nannan" <nannan.lu@...el.com>,
        "Bowers, AndrewX" <andrewx.bowers@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next 1/5] ice: add the virtchnl handler for AdminQ command

On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 01:17:26 +0000 Wang, Haiyue wrote:
> > Could you say a little more about the application and motivation for
> > this?
> 
> Sure, I will try to describe the whole story.
> 
> > We are talking about a single control domain here, correct?  
> 
> Correct.

We have a long standing policy of not supporting or helping bifurcated
drivers.

I'm tossing this from patchwork.