[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <67a68a77-f287-1bb1-3221-24e8b3351958@iogearbox.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 00:28:16 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>, ast@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: add a new bpf argument type
ARG_CONST_MAP_PTR_OR_NULL
On 7/15/20 9:00 AM, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> Add a new bpf argument type ARG_CONST_MAP_PTR_OR_NULL which could be
> used when we want to allow NULL pointer for map parameter. The bpf helper
> need to take care and check if the map is NULL when use this type.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
Is this patch to be merged into the set in [0] for passing NULL ex_map as discussed?
Seems you sent out two incomplete sets?
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200709013008.3900892-1-liuhangbin@gmail.com/T/#m99a8fa8ffe79d5f00d305c0800ad3abe619294f2
> ---
> include/linux/bpf.h | 1 +
> kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 11 ++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
> index c67c88ad35f8..9d4dbef3c943 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -253,6 +253,7 @@ enum bpf_arg_type {
> ARG_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM, /* pointer to dynamically allocated memory */
> ARG_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM_OR_NULL, /* pointer to dynamically allocated memory or NULL */
> ARG_CONST_ALLOC_SIZE_OR_ZERO, /* number of allocated bytes requested */
> + ARG_CONST_MAP_PTR_OR_NULL, /* const argument used as pointer to bpf_map or NULL */
> };
>
> /* type of values returned from helper functions */
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index 3c1efc9d08fd..d3551a19853a 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> @@ -3849,9 +3849,13 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 arg,
> expected_type = SCALAR_VALUE;
> if (type != expected_type)
> goto err_type;
> - } else if (arg_type == ARG_CONST_MAP_PTR) {
> + } else if (arg_type == ARG_CONST_MAP_PTR ||
> + arg_type == ARG_CONST_MAP_PTR_OR_NULL) {
> expected_type = CONST_PTR_TO_MAP;
> - if (type != expected_type)
> + if (register_is_null(reg) &&
> + arg_type == ARG_CONST_MAP_PTR_OR_NULL)
> + /* final test in check_stack_boundary() */;
> + else if (type != expected_type)
> goto err_type;
> } else if (arg_type == ARG_PTR_TO_CTX ||
> arg_type == ARG_PTR_TO_CTX_OR_NULL) {
> @@ -3957,7 +3961,8 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 arg,
> return -EFAULT;
> }
>
> - if (arg_type == ARG_CONST_MAP_PTR) {
> + if (arg_type == ARG_CONST_MAP_PTR ||
> + (arg_type == ARG_CONST_MAP_PTR_OR_NULL && !register_is_null(reg))) {
> /* bpf_map_xxx(map_ptr) call: remember that map_ptr */
> meta->map_ptr = reg->map_ptr;
I would probably have the semantics a bit different in the sense that I would
update meta->map_ptr to the last ARG_CONST_MAP_PTR, meaning:
meta->map_ptr = register_is_null(reg) ? NULL : reg->map_ptr;
> } else if (arg_type == ARG_PTR_TO_MAP_KEY) {
>
In combination with the set, this also needs test_verifier selftests in order to
exercise BPF insn snippets for the good & [expected] bad case.
Thanks,
Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists